← Systems & Methods

Systems & Methods

The Reputation Machine:
who defends the accused, and where they trained

Three invoices in the Justice Department’s own Epstein Library show that in 2017 — as journalists were returning to the story — Jeffrey Epstein paid the New York crisis firm Hiltzik Strategies $25,000 a month for “communications counsel.” Matthew Hiltzik appears hundreds of times in the released files. The publicist who spent nearly a decade as his executive vice president went on to run reputation defence for Johnny Depp against Amber Heard, and then for Justin Baldoni against Blake Lively — whose complaint describes, with the texts attached, how an abuse allegation is made to disappear from public view.

Epstein → Hiltzik
$25,000/month · 2017
Invoices in the files
3
Hiltzik mentions
Hundreds
Nathan at Hiltzik
~10 years
Charged
None
Read this first

Nobody named here has been charged with any offence in connection with Epstein, and crisis public relations is a lawful profession. Blake Lively’s allegations are allegations, contested by the defendants: their counsel says The Agency Group “operated as any crisis management firm would when hired by a client experiencing threats by two extremely powerful people with unlimited resources.” This page documents a professional lineage and the tactics described in court filings — not a finding of wrongdoing.

The Finding
Epstein paid a New York crisis PR firm $25,000 a month in 2017. The people who worked there went on to run reputation defence for two of the most prominent men accused of abuse in the following decade.
This is not an inference from proximity. Three invoices in the DOJ’s own Epstein Library record the payments, and Matthew Hiltzik is mentioned hundreds of times in the released files. Melissa Nathan, who spent nearly a decade as his executive vice president, is named in the files as well — and later represented Johnny Depp against Amber Heard, then Justin Baldoni against Blake Lively.

Why this belongs in the archive rather than in an entertainment column.

This site documents the machinery that let the operation run in plain sight — the money, the introductions, and the reputation management. The PR layer is usually treated as the least serious of the three. It may be the most durable.

What Epstein was buying in 2017. Not silence about a conviction nine years old — that was public. He was buying narrative management at the precise moment Giuffre’s litigation was drawing journalists back to the story.

What makes the lineage significant. The same firm, and then the same individual, went on to be retained by men facing abuse allegations — and, per the Lively complaint, to deploy techniques designed not to rebut the allegations but to make the public stop looking at them.

The through-line is a method, not a conspiracy. No document suggests Epstein had any involvement in the Depp or Baldoni matters; he was dead before either began. What transferred was a practice — and the practice was refined on his account.

Why a site about trafficking should care about a Hollywood lawsuit. Because the filings describe, in operational detail, how an accusation of sexual misconduct can be made to disappear from public attention. That is the mechanism survivors in this archive faced for two decades, documented here with the texts attached.

The Documentary Anchor

In the DOJ’s Epstein Library: three invoices from Hiltzik Strategies to Jeffrey Epstein.

Amount: $25,000 per month.

For: “communications counsel and public relations services.”

Months billed: June, July and October 2017.

Hiltzik appears hundreds of times across the released files. Melissa Nathan is named in them too.

Section 01

The Lineage

2017
Epstein hires Hiltzik

Three invoices in the DOJ’s Epstein Library show Matthew Hiltzik billed Epstein $25,000 a month for “communications counsel and public relations services” — rendered in June, July and October 2017. Hiltzik is mentioned hundreds of times in the released files. The timing is not incidental: journalists were re-examining the allegations, which had resurfaced in Virginia Giuffre’s defamation suit against Ghislaine Maxwell.

2014–2024
Nathan works under Hiltzik

Melissa Nathan spent nearly a decade at Hiltzik Strategies, rising to executive vice president. She is also named in the Epstein Files. Several Hiltzik colleagues later followed her to her own firm.

2016–2017
The political channel

Hiltzik and Nathan represented Ivanka and Tiffany Trump during Trump’s first campaign. In 2017 Hope Hicks moved from Hiltzik Strategies to become White House communications director.

2022
Depp v. Heard

Hiltzik and Nathan represent Johnny Depp through his defamation trial against Amber Heard — a case widely credited with reshaping public sympathy in a high-profile abuse dispute.

Jun 2024
Nathan goes independent

She launches The Agency Group (TAG), taking Depp and other clients with her. Reported majority stake co-owned by Scooter Braun.

Aug 2024
Baldoni

TAG is hired by Justin Baldoni during the It Ends With Us release, as reports of a rift with Blake Lively surface.

Dec 2024
The complaint

Lively sues, alleging a “retaliatory social manipulation campaign” orchestrated by Nathan. Filed texts include one attributed to Nathan: “You know we can bury anyone.”

Section 02

The Techniques, As Described in Filings

All of the following come from Blake Lively’s complaint or the related Jonesworks suit. They are allegations, denied by the defendants — and they are unusually specific about method.

Social platform manipulation

Per the complaint, Nathan and Jennifer Abel “leveraged their teams to create and perpetuate negative content” on Reddit and TikTok. Texts propose “full social account take downs” and “threads of theories” to redirect public attention.

Fake accounts

A separate suit by publicist Stephanie Jones alleges the team used “more than a dozen fake social media accounts and dark web accounts” to defame her firm.

Placed press

Texts reference speaking off the record to a journalist at the Daily Mail, using sources at Variety to push a claim that Ryan Reynolds was “anti-feminist,” and Abel citing a friend of twelve years at People magazine.

Distraction by theory

The stated aim in the filings was to generate discussion threads that would distract from the sexual-harassment allegations themselves — not to rebut them.

Why the Detail Matters Here

This archive documents a Manila operation paid to strip “jail” and “pedophile” from Epstein’s Google suggestions, publicists placing favourable coverage, and a lab director proposing to route his gifts through another foundation to conceal their origin.

The Lively filings describe the same category of work with the receipts attached — which is why they are useful evidence about how reputation defence actually operates, independent of who is right in that dispute.

The Laundry →

Section 03

The Press Relationships

The outlets named in the Lively complaint are specific, and one correspondence is worth setting out carefully.

The filings reference a Daily Mail journalist spoken to off the record, sources at Variety, a contact of twelve years at People, and coordination around New York Post and Page Six coverage.

Sara Nathan has been editor-at-large at the New York Post since 2018. Before that she was executive editor at People, and before that MailOnline’s US showbusiness editor-at-large until 2015.

Her career runs through three of the four outlets named in the complaint.

She is widely reported to be Melissa Nathan’s sister, and the Lively complaint is reported to reference coordination between them on Post and Page Six coverage. This site has not been able to verify the familial relationship in a primary document or a major-outlet report, and flags it as reported rather than established. It should not be repeated as fact without better sourcing.

What is established without the family question. The complaint alleges a publicist coordinating placement across named outlets, and the career record shows a senior editor whose tenure spans those same outlets. Those two facts stand on their own, and neither requires the other.

Outlets named in the filings
Daily Mail — a journalist spoken to off the record, per texts
Variety — sources used to place a claim about Ryan Reynolds
People — Abel citing a contact of twelve years
New York Post / Page Six — coordination on coverage, per reporting on the complaint
Reddit and TikTok — content creation and amplification by subcontractor
All allegations, contested by the defendants. No court has ruled on them.
Stated Plainly

Not established: that any journalist named or unnamed acted improperly, that any outlet knowingly published planted material, or that Epstein had any connection to the Depp or Baldoni matters.

Established: the invoices, the employment history, and the fact that these outlets are named in filings.

Section 04

Open Questions

?
What did the $25,000 a month buy?
Three invoices record the payments and the service description. No work product, strategy memo or placement record has been released.
?
Why does Hiltzik appear hundreds of times?
The volume far exceeds three invoices. The substance of that correspondence has not been publicly analysed.
?
In what capacity is Nathan named?
She is reported to appear in the files. The context and volume of those mentions has not been detailed.
?
Was the 2017 engagement the first?
The invoices cover three months of one year. Whether the relationship began earlier or continued later is not established.
?
Are the Nathans related?
Widely reported, and referenced in coverage of the Lively complaint. Not confirmed here in a primary document or major-outlet report.
?
Who else did Hiltzik represent?
The firm’s roster included Ivanka and Tiffany Trump, and Hope Hicks left it for the White House in 2017. The full client list during the Epstein engagement is not public.

Section 05

Sources

Spitfire News

The Epstein Connection to Depp and Baldoni

Feb 2026. The three invoices, the $25,000 monthly billing, the hundreds of mentions, and the Hiltzik–Nathan lineage.

spitfirenews.com →
Newsweek

The Publicists in the Lawsuit

Nathan’s career — EVP at Hiltzik Strategies, the founding of TAG, and the colleagues who followed her.

newsweek.com →
NBC News

The Jonesworks Suit

The allegation of “more than a dozen fake social media accounts,” and the defendants’ response that TAG acted as any crisis firm would.

nbcnews.com →
HuffPost

The Crisis Team’s Other Clients

Depp, Drake and others — and the “we can bury anyone” text cited in the complaint.

huffpost.com →
Deadline

The Hiring

Aug 2024. Nathan hired by Baldoni, after “a decade with Gotham based crisis PR guru Matthew Hiltzik.”

deadline.com →
Companion report

The Press File

Wolff, Thomas, the #MeToo tracking, and the four outlets named in the filings.

Read the report →
Companion report

Platform Manipulation

Reddit, TikTok, the fake accounts, and the Manila search-suggestion operation.

Read the report →
Companion report

“We Can Bury Anyone”

What crisis PR firms actually do — astroturfing, untraceability, and the money route.

Read the report →
Companion report

The Frame

The four-part formula Epstein wrote down — and why not one word of it addresses whether anything happened.

Read the report →
Companion report

The Manila Operation

He paid $10–20k a month to delete “pedophile” from his own autocomplete. Google was never asked.

Read the report →
Cross-reference

Michael Wolff

The advice, the 100 hours, and what journalism ethicists said about it.

Read the profile →
Cross-reference

Matthew Hiltzik

The full profile — Weinstein’s spokesman, Epstein’s publicist, and the Trump White House pipeline.

Read the profile →
Cross-reference

The Laundry

The Manila search-suggestion operation, the publicists, and the foundation-routing proposal.

Read the report →
Cross-reference

The Survivors

What the reputation machinery was operating against.

Read the report →
Document index

The Epstein Library

Where the Hiltzik invoices sit in the DOJ release.

justice.gov/epstein ↗