← Key Figures

Key Figures

Lawrence Krauss:
the defence, and the reversal

A theoretical physicist of international standing, and one of the most visible science communicators in the world. His Origins Project at Arizona State took roughly $250,000 from an Epstein foundation, with the giving continuing until April 2017 — nine years after the guilty plea. In 2011 he told the Daily Beast that Epstein’s accusers were wrong about the girls’ ages, that “as a scientist” he would believe Epstein over them, and that he felt “raised” by the association. In February 2018, facing detailed misconduct allegations of his own, he forwarded the reporter’s emails to Epstein and asked how to respond. Epstein wrote him a media strategy.

From Enhanced Education
~$250,000
Giving ran to
April 2017
ASU finding
Code of Ethics violation
Origins Project
Shuttered 2018
Criminal charges
None
Read this first

Lawrence Krauss has never been charged with any criminal offence and has consistently denied the misconduct allegations against him, calling the reporting “libelous” and saying the encounters described either did not happen or were consensual. The findings against him were made by a university under its own code of ethics, not by a court. This page documents the money, the public defence he gave Epstein, and what he did when the same kind of allegation was made about him.

The Finding
He defended Epstein publicly in 2011. When he was accused himself in 2018, he went to Epstein for advice on how to handle it.
That sequence is the whole file. A prominent scientist told a reporter that Epstein’s accusers were wrong about the girls’ ages and that he felt “raised” by the association. Seven years later, facing a misconduct investigation of his own, he forwarded the reporter’s emails to Epstein and asked what to do. Epstein wrote him a media strategy.

Most people in this archive took Epstein’s money and said nothing. Harvard took $9.1 million. MIT logged gifts as anonymous. The institutional pattern was silence.

Krauss is the exception, and that is why he has a file. He did not merely accept the money — he went on the record defending the man, using his scientific authority to do it.

The 2011 quote is the most damaging thing any funded scientist said about Epstein, and it is worth reading as an argument rather than a soundbite:

“As a scientist I always judge things on empirical evidence, and he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I’ve never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.”

He is invoking the authority of scientific method — his own credibility as a physicist — to explain why a convicted man’s account should outweigh the accounts of the girls. Epstein had pleaded guilty three years earlier.

Then the position reversed. In February 2018 BuzzFeed published detailed misconduct allegations against Krauss. He denied them, called the reporting libelous, and privately sought Epstein’s help.

What Epstein supplied was not a character reference. It was a media plan: find a reporter, supply a frame, change the subject. It is documented in full on the press file.

The Reversal

2011 — Krauss on Epstein’s accusers: “not as young as the ones that were claimed.” On the association: “I feel raised by it.”

2018 — Krauss, accused himself, forwards a reporter’s enquiries to Epstein and asks how to respond.

Epstein’s answer: “I would look for some reporter to do a more nuanced post-morten on the case — with Trump overtones, legal joustings, #metoo-isms, and profit-motives.”

The press file →

Section 01

The Record

1954
Born

Lawrence Maxwell Krauss, born 27 May in New York City, raised in Toronto. Becomes a theoretical physicist and cosmologist at Yale, then Case Western Reserve.

1995
Celebrity

The Physics of Star Trek makes him a public figure. He becomes one of the most visible science communicators in the world and a prominent anti-theist, later publishing A Universe from Nothing.

2006
The first conference

Krauss organises a physics conference funded by an Epstein foundation — two years before Epstein’s guilty plea.

2008
ASU

Recruited to Arizona State University as the inaugural director of the Origins Project. The same year, Epstein pleads guilty to soliciting a minor for prostitution.

2001–2017
The money

Epstein’s foundation Enhanced Education gives approximately $250,000 to the Origins Project. Krauss continued accepting it after the 2008 plea. Enhanced Education appears to have filed with the IRS only once, for 2002.

2011
The defence

Asked by the Daily Beast about Epstein, Krauss says: “Jeffrey has surrounded himself with beautiful women and young women, but they’re not as young as the ones that were claimed… he always has women ages 19 to 23 around him, but I’ve never seen anything else, so as a scientist, my presumption is that whatever the problems were I would believe him over other people.” He adds: “I don’t feel tarnished in any way by my relationship with Jeffrey; I feel raised by it.”

22 Feb 2018
BuzzFeed

Peter Aldhous publishes “He Became A Celebrity For Putting Science Before God. Now Lawrence Krauss Faces Allegations Of Sexual Misconduct.” Allegations include pinning a woman to a hotel bed and forcibly kissing her in 2006, groping a woman in Iowa in 2011, and groping a woman at a conference in Australia. Four former ASU staff describe sexist remarks. Krauss issued a nine-page denial calling it a “libelous story” that “ignored counter-evidence, distorted the facts.”

2018
He asks Epstein for help

Newly released emails show Krauss forwarding his correspondence with the reporter to Epstein and seeking his advice on how to respond. Epstein drafts a media strategy: “I would look for some reporter to do a more nuanced post-morten on the case — with Trump overtones, legal joustings, #metoo-isms, and profit-motives.”

Mar 2018
Leave

ASU places him on paid administrative leave and bars him from campus, reopening its investigation into the Australian convention allegation. He resigns as chairman of the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists board, which manages the Doomsday Clock.

2018
The finding

Based on interviews with the complainant and two eyewitnesses, ASU investigators conclude Krauss “created an offensive environment for academic pursuits” and violated the university’s Code of Ethics. A university investigation found he violated ASU’s sexual harassment policies in at least one instance.

Aug 2018
Removed

Krauss is removed as director of the Origins Project. ASU shutters the project entirely.

May 2019
Retirement

He retires from ASU after a year on paid leave.

Nov 2025
In the files

House Oversight releases more than 20,000 documents. The Krauss–Epstein correspondence about the misconduct allegations is among them — alongside an email in which Krauss tells Epstein: “We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU. Sorry…”

Section 02

The Money and the Project

Approximately $250,000 reached the Origins Project from Epstein’s foundation Enhanced Education. Records obtained by BuzzFeed News place the giving across a span running from the early 2000s to April 2017 — nine years after the guilty plea.

The foundation itself barely existed on paper. Enhanced Education appears to have filed with the IRS only once, for 2002. One ASU record listed Epstein’s employer as “Leon D. Black, Enhanced Education” — conflating the donor and the man whose philanthropy Epstein was directing.

The relationship began before the conviction and did not stop at it. Krauss organised an Epstein-funded physics conference in 2006. He was recruited to found Origins in 2008, the year of the plea. The money continued for nearly a decade after.

And it ran alongside the Leon Black money. Leon and Debra Black gave $2 million to Origins, including a pledge binding on Black’s estate — gifts Epstein directed. A released email has Krauss updating Epstein on the accounting: “We were able to keep the Leon Black money, but the $25K from your foundation is getting bounced by MIT back to ASU. Sorry…”

Read that email closely. The apology is to Epstein, for a donation another institution refused. The relationship being managed there is not donor-to-beneficiary. It is closer to colleague-to-colleague.

ASU shut the Origins Project down in 2018. The university had no donor prohibition in place at any point — unlike Harvard, which had barred Epstein in 2008 and watched the money arrive anyway through other names.

What ASU concluded
Investigation reopened March 2018 into the Australian Skeptics Convention allegation
Based on interviews with the complainant and two eyewitnesses
Finding: Krauss “created an offensive environment for academic pursuits” and violated the university's Code of Ethics
A university investigation found he violated ASU's sexual harassment policies in at least one instance
August 2018 — removed as Origins Project director; the project is shuttered
May 2019 — retires after a year on paid leave
Krauss denied all allegations and was never criminally charged.

Section 03

What the Credential Was For

This archive keeps finding the same transaction: Epstein bought scientific standing, and the scientists got funding. Krauss shows what the standing was actually worth.

It was not the money. $250,000 over fifteen years is modest — Harvard took thirty-six times as much.

It was the sentence “as a scientist.” A theoretical physicist of international reputation, invoking empirical method, telling a reporter that the accusers were wrong. That is not something money can buy directly. It has to be volunteered.

And it worked in both directions. Epstein got a credentialed defender in 2011. Krauss got, in 2018, a man experienced in surviving exactly the accusation he was facing — and asked him how.

The symmetry is the point of this page. The defence Krauss offered Epstein was that the women were older than claimed and that the accused should be believed over the accusers. Seven years later he needed the same argument made about himself.

What the record does not establish. That Krauss knew anything about Epstein’s crimes, that he participated in anything, or that Epstein’s media strategy was ever executed. No resulting article has been identified.

What it does establish is that when a prominent scientist faced a #MeToo allegation, the person he turned to for counsel was a registered sex offender whose foundation had funded his research — and that the offender had a strategy ready.

Held Carefully

Documented: the $250,000, the 2011 quotes, the ASU findings, the correspondence seeking Epstein’s advice, and Epstein’s drafted strategy.

Not established: any criminal conduct by Krauss, any knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, or that the media plan was carried out.

His position: the allegations are false or describe consensual encounters; the reporting was libelous and ignored counter-evidence.

Section 04

Open Questions

?
Was the media strategy executed?
Epstein proposed finding a reporter for a “nuanced post-mortem.” No resulting article has been identified.
?
How much did Enhanced Education give in total?
Approximately $250,000 to Origins per BuzzFeed’s records. The foundation filed with the IRS only once, so no complete accounting exists.
?
What else is in the correspondence?
The released tranche includes exchanges about the allegations and the donations. The full extent of the Krauss–Epstein correspondence has not been published.
?
Did ASU review the funding?
The university shuttered the project in 2018. No published review of the Epstein money at ASU, comparable to Harvard’s or MIT’s, has been released.
?
Who else attended the 2006 conference?
An Epstein foundation funded it, two years before the plea. Its attendee list has not been published.
?
What happened to the Black pledge?
A $2m irrevocable pledge to Origins was binding on Black’s estate. Whether it survived the project’s closure is not established.

Section 05

Sources

The Arizona State Press

$250,000 From Epstein

Jul 2019. The BuzzFeed records, the 2011 Daily Beast quotes in full, and the ASU sexual harassment finding.

statepress.com →
The Observer · CWRU

Krauss in the Epstein Files

Nov 2025. The released emails showing him seeking Epstein’s advice on responding to the BuzzFeed reporter.

observer.case.edu →
Arizona Agenda

Arizona’s in the Epstein Files

Dec 2025. The Leon Black accounting email, and the contrast with institutions that quietly took the money without defending him.

arizonaagenda.com →
Phoenix New Times

He Defended Epstein First

Jul 2019. Enhanced Education’s single IRS filing, and the giving period.

phoenixnewtimes.com →
Fox News · AP

Placed on Leave

Mar 2018. The specific allegations, his nine-page denial, and his resignation from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists.

foxnews.com →
Companion report

The Research Ledger

Ten funded programmes audited against his stated aims — and the four that had no connection at all.

Read the report →
Companion report

The Frame

The four-part formula Epstein wrote down — and why not one word of it addresses whether anything happened.

Read the report →
Cross-reference

Marvin Minsky

The first MIT grant, the jail visits, the 2011 boat manifest — and an allegation he never answered.

Read the profile →
Cross-reference

Arizona State

The $2.25m, the absent donor policy, and the Origins Project in full.

Read the report →
Cross-reference

The Press File

Epstein’s 2018 media strategy for the Krauss allegations, and how he tracked #MeToo in real time.

Read the report →
Cross-reference

The Origins Project

What the programme was, who it convened, and what the money bought.

Read the report →